Energy Conservation Code
The New York City Energy Conservation Code (NYCECC) is comprised of New York City local laws and the current Energy Conservation Construction Code of New York State (ECCCNYS). By State law, all local government energy codes, including the NYCECC, must be more stringent than the ECCCNYS.
2016 NYC Energy Conservation Code
2014 NYC Energy Conservation Code
2011 NYC Energy Conservation Code
UPDATE: 2016 New York City Energy Conservation Code
The 2016 New York State Energy Conservation Construction Code, based on the 2015 International Energy Conservation Code and ASHRAE 90.1-2013 – as modified by the State of New York, will go into effect on October 3, 2016. Adopted as Local Law 91 of 2016, the 2016 New York City Energy Conservation Code (NYCECC), based on the State Code and further modified, will also go into effect on October 3, 2016. Legislation is currently pending with New York City Council to amend the 2016 NYCECC based on recent changes made by the NYS Supplement. Please visit our website periodically for updates.
- Applications filed on or after October 3, 2016 will be subject to the 2016 NYCECC. Complete applications filed on or before October 2, 2016 will be subject to the 2014 NYCECC.
NOTE: Complete applications are those that meet the submittal requirements of Buildings Bulletin 2014-015 and include a complete energy analysis.
- Incomplete applications filed on or before October 2, 2016, may be subject to the 2016 NYCECC.
Local Law 91 of 2016 may be found on the New York City Council’s website. Once available, a published hard copy version can be purchased at the City Store will be available for purchase, and will also be viewable on this webpage.
The 2016 NYCECC applies to completed job applications filed on or after October 3, 2016. All completed job applications filed on or before October 2, 2016 can continue review under the 2014 NYCECC.
Application Types Not Regulated by the Energy Code
Full demolition, sign and subdivision applications are not required to comply with the NYCECC. However, sign applications that affect a building’s envelope must be accompanied by an alteration application for the envelope work, which must comply with the NYCECC.
Under Article 11 of the New York State Energy Law, only the Secretary of State has the authority to provide waivers from Energy Code compliance, not the local jurisdiction. Contact the Codes Division of the Department of State for an application for variance at (518) 474-4073 or by email at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Software for Energy Analysis
REScheck, COMcheck, and DOE2-based software can be used to conduct the energy analysis and are available for free at the US Department of Energy and may be used as follows:
- REScheck: The full report shall be provided, including the building envelope, HVAC/service water heating and checklists. The New York City version must be used. The IECC version of REScheck is not acceptable
- COMcheck: Depending on whether you use NYCECC or ASHRAE Standard 90.1/2013 for compliance, the respective version of COMcheck should be used. Use the 2016 NYCECC version for ECC compliance and the ASHRAE 90.1/2013 version for compliance with that standard.
- DOE2: For more complex energy modeling, including where trade-offs among disciplines or renewable energy sources are used, a DOE2-based software should be used. Such software, including updates, may include DOE2.1E, VisualDOE, EnergyPlus or eQuest. Other energy modeling programs must be approved by the Secretary of State of New York and the Buildings Commissioner prior to submission.
Required Documents for Construction Sign-Off
The following documents must be completed and submitted to the Department in order to ensure all work is in compliance with the New York City Energy Conservation Code (NYCECC) and before the Department can sign-off on al completed work:
TR8: Technical Report Statement of Responsibility for Energy Code Progress Inspections: The progress inspector must certify that all Progress Inspections noted on the original TR8 and on TR8s filed with in any post-approval amendments (PAAs) have been satisfied. The progress inspector must sign and seal the TR8, certifying that inspected work complies with the approved drawings
EN2: Certification of Conformance with As-Built Energy Analysis: The progress inspector(s) must certify on this form that the as-built values for energy in the building match the values in the last-approved Energy Analysis. If they do not, then an as-built energy analysis must be prepared by the applicant of record and the progress inspector(s) must certify on the EN2 Form that the as-built values for energy in the building match the values in the as-built energy analysis. The as-built energy analysis must be professionally certified and submitted with the EN2 form at sign-off.
When Construction has Changed from the Approved Drawings
Design applicants are required to update their drawings, including the energy analysis, when conditions result in a design change during construction (Section ECC 103.4). These drawings, including the energy analysis, must be submitted to the Department for approval.
If construction differs from the last-approved energy analysis prior to sign-off, the original preparer of the energy analysis must prepare an as-built energy analysis using the values actually used in the construction. The energy analysis must demonstrate compliance with the NYCECC and the preparer must sign and seal the analysis, certifying that the work is in compliance. The progress inspector must then certify in the EN2 form that the values in the professionally certified energy analysis match the existing construction.
If the construction changes result in a building no longer complying with the NYCECC, as demonstrated by a failed energy analysis, the progress inspector cannot certify on the EN2 Form that the work is in compliance and the application cannot be signed-off.
- 2017-005 – HVAC/Service Hot Water Buildings Bulletin
- 2017-006 – Envelope Buildings Bulletin
If you have any additional questions about the NYCECC, please email the Department at EnergyCode@buildings.nyc.gov. Also, see the Energy Code FAQ page for more information.
Organizing Your Analysis
This resource covers how to write a rhetorical analysis essay of primarily visual texts with a focus on demonstrating the author’s understanding of the rhetorical situation and design principles.
Contributors:Mark Pepper, Allen Brizee, Elizabeth Angeli
Last Edited: 2015-08-30 05:01:04
There is no one perfect way to organize a rhetorical analysis essay. In fact, writers should always be a bit leery of plug-in formulas that offer a perfect essay format. Remember, organization itself is not the enemy, only organization without considering the specific demands of your particular writing task. That said, here are some general tips for plotting out the overall form of your essay.
Like any rhetorical analysis essay, an essay analyzing a visual document should quickly set the stage for what you’re doing. Try to cover the following concerns in the initial paragraphs:
- Make sure to let the reader know you’re performing a rhetorical analysis. Otherwise, they may expect you to take positions or make an evaluative argument that may not be coming.
- Clearly state what the document under consideration is and possibly give some pertinent background information about its history or development. The intro can be a good place for a quick, narrative summary of the document. The key word here is “quick, for you may be dealing with something large (for example, an entire episode of a cartoon like the Simpsons). Save more in-depth descriptions for your body paragraph analysis.
- If you’re dealing with a smaller document (like a photograph or an advertisement), and copyright allows, the introduction or first page is a good place to integrate it into your page.
- Give a basic run down of the rhetorical situation surrounding the document: the author, the audience, the purpose, the context, etc.
Thesis Statements and Focus
Many authors struggle with thesis statements or controlling ideas in regards to rhetorical analysis essays. There may be a temptation to think that merely announcing the text as a rhetorical analysis is purpose enough. However, especially depending on your essay’s length, your reader may need a more direct and clear statement of your intentions. Below are a few examples.
1. Clearly narrow the focus of what your essay will cover. Ask yourself if one or two design aspects of the document is interesting and complex enough to warrant a full analytical treatment.
The website for Amazon.com provides an excellent example of alignment and proximity to assist its visitors in navigating a potentially large and confusing amount of information.
2. Since visual documents often seek to move people towards a certain action (buying a product, attending an event, expressing a sentiment), an essay may analyze the rhetorical techniques used to accomplish this purpose. The thesis statement should reflect this goal.
The call-out flyer for the Purdue Rowing Team uses a mixture of dynamic imagery and tantalizing promises to create interest in potential, new members.
3. Rhetorical analysis can also easily lead to making original arguments. Performing the analysis may lead you to an argument; or vice versa, you may start with an argument and search for proof that supports it.
A close analysis of the female body images in the July 2007 issue of Cosmopolitan magazine reveals contradictions between the articles’ calls for self-esteem and the advertisements’ unrealistic, beauty demands.
These are merely suggestions. The best measure for what your focus and thesis statement should be the document itself and the demands of your writing situation. Remember that the main thrust of your thesis statement should be on how the document creates meaning and accomplishes its purposes. The OWl has additional information on writing thesis statements.
Analysis Order (Body Paragraphs)
Depending on the genre and size of the document under analysis, there are a number of logical ways to organize your body paragraphs. Below are a few possible options. Which ever you choose, the goal of your body paragraphs is to present parts of the document, give an extended analysis of how that part functions, and suggest how the part ties into a larger point (your thesis statement or goal).
This is the most straight-forward approach, but it can also be effective if done for a reason (as opposed to not being able to think of another way). For example, if you are analyzing a photo essay on the web or in a booklet, a chronological treatment allows you to present your insights in the same order that a viewer of the document experiences those images. It is likely that the images have been put in that order and juxtaposed for a reason, so this line of analysis can be easily integrated into the essay.
Be careful using chronological ordering when dealing with a document that contains a narrative (i.e. a television show or music video). Focusing on the chronological could easily lead you to plot summary which is not the point of a rhetorical analysis.
A spatial ordering covers the parts of a document in the order the eye is likely to scan them. This is different than chronological order, for that is dictated by pages or screens where spatial order concerns order amongst a single page or plane. There are no unwavering guidelines for this, but you can use the following general guidelines.
- Left to right and top to down is still the normal reading and scanning pattern for English-speaking countries.
- The eye will naturally look for centers. This may be the technical center of the page or the center of the largest item on the page.
- Lines are often used to provide directions and paths for the eye to follow.
- Research has shown that on web pages, the eye tends to linger in the top left quadrant before moving left to right. Only after spending a considerable amount of time on the top, visible portion of the page will they then scroll down.
The classic, rhetorical appeals are logos, pathos, and ethos. These concepts roughly correspond to the logic, emotion, and character of the document’s attempt to persuade. You can find more information on these concepts elsewhere on the OWL. Once you understand these devices, you could potentially order your essay by analyzing the document’s use of logos, ethos, and pathos in different sections.
The conclusion of a rhetorical analysis essay may not operate too differently from the conclusion of any other kind of essay. Still, many writers struggle with what a conclusion should or should not do. You can find tips elsewhere on the OWL on writing conclusions. In short, however, you should restate your main ideas and explain why they are important; restate your thesis; and outline further research or work you believe should be completed to further your efforts.